|
Your pictures of G-K/43 pouches are most welcome for
posting.
In a letter from the "Infanterieschule" dated Aug. 15,
1944, it is described how the German soldier had 10
rounds in a magazine on the rifle and 20 rounds in
magazines stored in pouches on his left side. The
soldier carried 30 rounds in the issued K98k three
pocket cartridge pouches on his right side. The same
tells the little butt stock manual "zum einlegen in das
Gerät"
It was also seen that the soldier simply cut the pouches
in half and then had only one magazine in his pouch. |
Some of the pouches represented here are genuine WWII
German manufacture and some could be reproduction and
post WWII manufacture. Most of the total fakes are made
within from about 1990 to 2002. So these pouches will not
exibit the natural aging process. The thread will
respond to ultra-violet rays (black light) or is made of
rayon and will not pass the "burn test". Sometimes the
smell of the leather can help you decide if the pouch is
genuine or questionable. Newer leather has a very
distinctive leather smell to it from the tannic acid or
other chemicals used in the leather tanning process.
This smell stays with the leather for quite a long time.
Be VERY suspicious about the Gew43/Kar43 code. A WaA
stamp late in the war on equipment like pouches isn"t
normal since personel from the WaA organization were
released for front line combat service. Note also that
many fake pouches have a WaA - and genuine K98 pouches
never have a WaA.
As we can see "ros" made magazine pouches of many
different types. "ros" and "bla" used the same
construction and I believe "ros" is the late war code
for "bla". "bla" is known to be: E.G.Leuner, Bautzen.
I hope this information will be helpful for "newbies"
looking for a pouch, but I must admit that the subject
becomes more and more confusing in line with more and
more types emerge. There are only a few types of K98
pouches, and why are there so many types of G43 pouches?
Is it because they were made late in the war with no
product description and because the factories were
forced to use the matrials they had?
This website has been designed around the year 2000, and I
have used material and color as the key words. But I must admit that
I should have used type of construction as common denominator, because
some manufacturers simply used what they had - brown or black leather - and so on. |
"Demjansk" pouches
Since the summer of 2002 there has been a steady flow of pouches
from an old storehouse in Demjansk in Russia. All these are
considered to be genuine and there are seen following types:
1a1, 1a2, 1b2, 3a, 3a2, 11a, 11b, 11d, 11e, 11f, 11g, 11h and 11i. The
price of a pair of G43 pouches could perhaps be $600 before all
these pouches showed up. The prices today are sometimes $100 and
in line with that it has become less and less profitable to make
fakes, so we can say that this website here has become less
interesting than it was some years ago.
The type 6a is very rare and did not come from Russian surplus stocks. Type 4a was often seen some years ago.
I have only seen one type 7a (genuine?)
Perhaps not so much a
horror photo for G43 pouch owners. I have got an email
from the man on top of the pile. He tells that most of
the pouches are Russian, but there are some Austrian too
and a very, very few German WWII pouches. |
1a1. Brown leather -
brown belt loops |
Code "bla 1944" inside
the left pouch. Rivets.
Genuine: Yes |
1a2. Brown leather -
black or brown belt loops |
Code "ros 1944" inside
the left pouch. Rivets. Different front straps aren"t
typical.
Genuine: Yes |
1a3. Brown leather - no rivets - brown belt loops |
Code "ros 1944" inside
the left pouch. No rivets but stitched. This must be a rare variation since "bla"/"ros" normally used rivets.
Genuine: Yes |
1b1. Brown
leather - no rivets
Marked: on the outside of the
front strap of the right pouch: "skl WaA721" The same
type as below but marked in a different way - and the
backside is different. Of a similar construction: "dtv 44" on the backside. |
Genuine: Presumed - Czech
made ?
|
1b2. Brown leather - no rivets
Marked under the lid in
front of the right pouch: "cny 43 - WaA14", "cny44" or
"cny 45". See also 3d, same shape but black leather
Genuine: Yes |
1b3. Brown leather - no rivets -
with brass studs and lines along the edges
No markings
Genuine: No I don't think so. I have seen another for
sale - exactly the same type with brass studs. The
Germans did never use brass for the G43 pouches.
|
1c. Brown leather,
handle in the front. |
Brown belt loops. Marked on the backside: "cxb 44". See
also 4b - same shape but black leather.
Genuine: Yes |
2a. Brown artificial
leather |
Code "gxy 44" on one loop. Kar43 on the other.
Genuine: No - Kar43 was never used on genuine pouches. |
2b. Brown presstoff
and brown leather loops |
No
markings
Genuine: Presumed not - but difficult to prove. Such
material is unknown in other cases. |
3a. Black glossy leather - brown loops (also seen
with black loops) |
Marked inside left flap: "bla 1944" and sometimes
WaA159. Many came in from Russia in the summer 2002.
Most have brown loops, some black loops and one of these
has WaA159.
Genuine: Yes |
3a3. Black pebbled artificial leather
- low bottom.
No horizontal straps. Only the loops are
made of genuine leather. Marked bla 1944 and WaA159 inside left
pouch.
Genuine: Yes
3b. Black glossy
leather - black loops |
Code "epf 1944" inside
the pouch (eqf is Karl Böcker) |
3c. Black glossy
leather - black loops |
Makers code "hte 44" and
WaA inside the pouch. Also seen with "eyp 44" on one
belt loop.
Genuine: No, the leather is a bit too thick, and does
not smell old enough to be original. Note also the lines along the edges. |
3d. Black glossy
leather - handle below |
Black belt loops. Marked
under the lid in front of the right pouch: "cny WaA14".
See also 1b2, same shape but brown leather
Genuine: Yes |
3f. Black, thick pig
skin |
Is
marked "hpc 45" on one belt loop which stands for
"Historical Parts Company"
Genuine: No |
4a. Black, thick pig
skin |
"RME45" ? on the left loop. 339 in blue ink inside right
pouch. (not all have this ink stamp - Czech acceptance
markings ?)
Genuine: It"s said that these are Czech post war pouches
but I think they are genuine because they have a German
makers code and made in a good quality. The Czechs used
a poor quality after the war. The third reason: some
have inside the flap of the right pouch an ink stamp in
German: Die .....erung erfolgt zu den Satzen ...
Wehrmachtstarif. It wasn't necessary to mention the
Wehrmacht after the war so that's another reason for
they are genuine. The fourth reason is that K98 ammo
pouches with the code RME44 are seen in a some cases
too.
Appeared in Czecho-Slovakia after the iron curtain fell.
(it's told that a French found them - with some brown
pouches - in a film studio in Prague in 1989)
(The third reason: I have later been told that die
Wehrmacht in some few cases inspected the hides and
placed a stamp near the edge of the hide. Pistol
holsters have been seen with such stamps - they are very
rare. So we must conclude that the leather has been
inspected by die Wehrmacht, but not necessarily used in
production before the capitulation)
|
|
4a1. Black, thick pig
skin painted Einheitsfarbe |
I
presume the painting was made after the war |
A pouch with WaA54 - twice - on the left front
strap is rapported
4a2. Black pressed
leather |
The leather is pressed not pebbled. The owner
believes that it has been made in DDR - that means after the
war.
Code "cxb" and "K43" or "cxb" and "44" on the backside.
See also 1d - same shape but brown leather.
Genuine: Yes |
5a. Black artificial
leather |
Black Ersatzleder. "dla
44" and WaA136 to one loop. G43 to the other. Brown belt
loops. Also seen with G43 to one loop and WaA and "clg
44" to the other (can also be hms 44).
Genuine: No. It's said that these can be bought in a
village outside Berlin for 35 $. |
Marked: "bmo 43"
Genuine: Presumed fake |
6a. Dark grey-blue
rubberized canvas |
Marked on one loop: OTTO KOBERSTEIN LANDSBERG a.W. On
the other loop: WaA14. The description of the color is:
"dark grey with a slight bluish tint" The name Otto
Koberstein, Landsberg am Warthe is also found on other
leather goods. Perhaps the most desired pouch today. The
same concerns: Max Koberstein, Landsberg / Warthe
Genuine: Yes |
7a. Sand colored heavy
linen with a red stripe |
Other pouches have the
red stripe placed elsewhere. Brown leather. No markings.
This type is also seen as MP38/40 and MP44 pouches.
Genuine: Presumed, but I must admit that I only seen one of this type G43 pouch. |
Black belt loops. Code "clg
44" and WaA.
Genuine: No, artificially aged |
Brown straps. D-ring and
belt loops in black leather. Code "oxo" or "oxq 44" to
one belt loop.
Genuine: Presumed but I must admit that I only have seen one pair of pouches of this type. |
Black leather. An old
repro type. |
Black leather
fittings. Straps marked "Gew 43 / Kar. 43", "emj 44" and
"WaA86?"
Genuine: The max. price must be 20 $ |
9d. Green webbing
One of the belt loops is marked:
"WaA204" and "44"
Genuine: Presumed not - same source as 8a. ?
9e. Green webbing
One of the belt loops is marked:
"WaA204" and "44"
Genuine: Presumed since the pouchees are worn inside of the magazines. Or of DDR origin - with WaA204 and 44 later added. The belt loops are of a smart design because it is possible to put the bag on the belt without loosening the belt
Black belt loops. Marked
"Kar 43 coq ?" and WaA866.
Genuine: No |
11a. Rubber
impregnated webbing - pebbled surface |
Black belt loops. Some
have code "bla 1944" or "ros 1944" inside the left pouch. Rivets. Seen
with "Lohmannwerke AG, Bielefeld, 1944" inside the lid
of the right pouch. In that case without the "bla" or "ros"
marking
Genuine: Yes |
11b. Rubber
impregnated webbing - smooth surface |
Code "ros 1944". Black
belt loops. No rivets.
Genuine: Yes |
11c. Light brown vinyl
construction |
D-ring and belt loops in
brown leather. Code "qkv 44" and WaA72.
Genuine: Presumed. The WaA looks questionable. |
11d. Light brown vinyl
construction |
D-ring and belt loops in
black leather. Code "fuq 1945" and WaA.
Genuine: Yes |
11e. Light brown vinyl
construction |
D-ring and belt loops in
brown leather. Code "fuq 1944" or "fuq 1945".
Genuine: Yes |
11f. Light brown vinyl
construction |
Black webbing belt loops,
D-ring in brown leather. Code fuq 1945.
Genuine: Yes |
11g. Light brown vinyl
construction |
Black webbing belt loops,
D-ring in brown leather. Code fuq 1945.
Genuine: Yes |
11h. Light brown vinyl
construction |
D-ring and belt loops in brown leather. Code bck 45.
Genuine: Yes |
11i. Grey brown vinyl
construction |
Belt loops and D-ring in
black leather. Also seen with brown leather. No codes.
Genuine: Yes |
11j. Olive
brown vinyl construction |
D-ring and belt
loops in brown leather. Marked Kar43 to one loop and
WaA313? hte44 to the other.
Genuine: No |
Has WaA stamp and 1942 (or perhaps 1943) on the
backside. A fake. |
13. Brown leather - a
fake |
Made for another weapon (French ?) and later marked on
the belt loops: WaA866 bcb43 and kar43. |
14. Grey webbing - a
fake |
Marked on the black leather loops: WaA623 and 378/000.
Too small for a G43 mag. Sold as original to me but must
be a fake. |
|
|